Redundancy
Apart from other quick initial permissions, litecoin doesn’t offer any other creative features when it’s compared to bitcoin. As a result of lack of creativeness, other people believe that litecoin cannot be equal or go beyond the value of bitcoin. what again remains to be perceived is whether the use of a different extraction agorithm and faster blocking times can add enough value to litecoin or not – in order to make user it last for life.
Vulnerability
Similar to bitcoin, litecoin can be attached to topic that can match or go beyond the new hash rate network. This 51percent attack becomes very daunting to make and sustain due to hashrate network which is constantly rising.
In addition, this debate would be sustainable if litecoin was designed to be insufficient on common computer components including CPU/GPU. Paving way to malicious entity that could generate lots of specialized hardware can beat the new hashing network.
Rejecting the bandwidth memory of 51percent attack theory might become invalidated with the debate that crypt is not styled to be insufficient on dedicated hardware; instead it is styled to be highly dependent on the bandwidth of the memory. Because the high speed RAM cache on latest processors already occupies most of the unused space, no considerable growth could be injected with development of dedicated chips.